AFBCMR BC-2012-05441
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT: XXXXXXX
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our
decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we
recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT,
be corrected to show that:
a. Her Fitness Assessment dated 17 May 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness
Management System.
b. The AF Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru TSgt), rendered for the
period 25 May 2010 through 24 May 2011, be declared void and removed from her records.
It is further recommended that she be provided supplemental consideration for promotion to
the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) for all appropriate cycles beginning with cycle 12E6.
If AFPC discovers any adverse factors during or subsequent to supplemental consideration
that are separate and apart, and unrelated to the issues involved in this application, that would have
rendered the applicant ineligible for the promotion, such information will be documented and
presented to the Board for a final determination on the individual's qualification for the promotion.
If supplemental promotion consideration results in the selection for promotion to the higher
grade, immediately after such promotion the records shall be corrected to show that applicant was
promoted to the higher grade on the date of rank established by the supplemental promotion and
that applicant is entitled to all pay, allowances, and benefits of such grade as of that date.
Members of the Boardconsidered this application on 13 August 2013.
Panel Chair
Attachments:
1. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM dated 8 February 2013
2. Letter, AFPC/DPSID dated 22 April 2013
3. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE dated 3 May 2013
2
2
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00554
AFPC/DPSIM recommended the fitness assessment dated 22 February 2011 be removed. Should the Board deem the fitness assessments date 1 June 2011 and 31 August 2011 invalid and direct the EPR be changed from a referral to a non-referral, the applicant will be entitled to supplemental promotion consideration beginning with cycle 12E6, once tested. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00756
The board should still consider whether the Control Roster which was issued not only for the contested FA failure, but also for two additional FA failures should be removed. HQ AFPC/DPSIDE administratively corrected the applicants EPR (by voiding the report) for the period 12 Aug 08 through 11 Apr 10, and replacing it with an AF Form 77 stating not rated for the time period, report was removed by order of Chief of Staff of the Air Force. Additionally, this action resulted in the...
If the referral EPR closing 11 Dec 96 is removed as requested, the applicant would normally be entitled to supplemental promotion consideration to technical sergeant beginning with the 97E6 cycle provided she is recommended by her commander and is otherwise qualified. However, as a result of her circumstances, the applicant has not received an EPR subsequent to the referral EPR (reason for ineligibility), has not taken the required promotion tests, and has not been considered or recommended...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02279
The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOE states, should the Board remove the three fitness failures from the applicants record, DPSOE recommends revoking the demotion orders and restoring the applicants rank to staff sergeant. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states at this time he does not have any additional evidence in support of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00365
Her referral 4 EPR was rendered as a result of the contested FA failures and should therefore also be removed from her records. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 20 May 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit F). The applicant contends that because she had a medical condition that unfairly precluded her from attaining passing fitness...
DPPPA notes the applicant provided several copies of performance feedbacks given since she came on active duty. In addition to the two performance feedbacks noted on the contested EPR, DPPPA notes the rater also completed a PFW on 19 May 93 in which he complimented her on her initiatives to keep up with her training. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we are persuaded that the contested report is not an accurate reflection of applicant’s performance during the time period...
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. On 30 Sep 99, applicant’s supervisor did not recommend her for reenlistment due to the referral EPR. A complete copy of the their evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and provided a five-page letter responding to the advisory opinions.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00264
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00264 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. As a result of the failed FAs, his projected promotion to the grade of SSgt was cancelled and he received a referral EPR. Although DPSOE initially recommended denial of the applicants request to be supplementally considered for promotion to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02502
His records be corrected to show that he is now and was promotion eligible during the time he was placed on a Control Roster. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOA recommends closing the case, since the applicant's record currently reflects his requested actions and they do not have the history, nor are they the OPR for control roster actions; however, based on the information provided the previous RE code 4I would have been a result of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04786
In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of her AF IMTs 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, corrected Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), Individual Fitness Assessment History, and supporting documentation from her doctor, supervisor and commander. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit...